To be clear, he's probaly just on YouTube or something, but it was mirrored on I2P.
The best ones are in the "Luke Smith Not Related" series:
But, the entire series is really good and highly recommended.
The other folder "The Populist Delusion Series" is another good one, really heady, worth working all the way through.
Those are some of the best podcasts I have stored up that aren't wacky.
Summer in Australia - Fact or Fiction?:Click Here for video.
Notes For: Summer in Australia - Fact or Fiction?:Click Here for PDF.
Here is the wiki page for Episode 23 of the David Wolfe podcast. I left this out of the video because I made a ground rule not to use external footage or sources of information except for 2 that I outline in the video.
No digital media was allowed to be used as evidence, except for the concepts contained in Level videos themselves and some Sunrise/Sunset time info that I am open to debate on.
This one makes a similar point using only a SFEM-approved map (w/ much needed light diagrams in the corners) and a simple concept of "if I'm standing on the Earth, and I point to the Sun during daytime, which direction do I point?" (i.e. "heading").
The globe is only used for comparison.
Which one agrees most with the "local sun" concept?
Which one relies on optical concepts such as "refraction"?
Which one seems the most linear and natural?
Azimuthal equidistant projection
The Level documentaries came out in 2021, 2022, and 2023 respectively.
Looks like all the interesting action happened in 2024, however.
Wikipedia propaganda page (I'm sure something happened, though)
Of course, anyone can just claim the evidence is fake.
True believers always have that out, no matter how compelling the evidence is.
So, stuff like this is inevitable...
Yet another lack of conclusive evidence...
...however, the comments are interesting.
"Flerfs who think an LED or green screen studio was used desperately avoid anyone knowing that Jered burned holes in paper with a magnifying glass while in Antarctica."
So, in the end, nobody is convicing anybody else.
Once your mind is made up about something like this, only you can change it.
Me, personally, I just go by the rules of evidence.
As an example, there is plenty of footage of midnight sun in Antarctica.
However, there is NO footage or evidence of a DARK night in Antarctica in December. Where is that footage?
Since there is an ABUNDANCE of evidence supporting one idea and a COMPLETE LACK of compelling evidence supporting an opposing idea, I go with the idea that actually has evidence over the one that doesn't. It's that simple.
Oh, and I believe my own eyes over anything that came through a lens or is stored on film or digitally. My eyes do not lie to me. But Google most certainly does.